• Home
  • DARPA SyNAPSE
  • Business-minded
  • Compute Me
  • Brainplug
  • Biophys-Ed

Being a robot with good “intentions”

Massimiliano Versace | March 23, 2009

Do all robots have good intentions?

Do all robots have good intentions?

Is a robot that is able to learn and take decisions “responsible“ for its own actions? Or is the company that manufactured the robot liable for the damage that the robot may cause, regardless of whether or not the machine was programmed to hurt anybody? Or is the owner of the robot responsible for its “bad habits“? When a pet robotic dog will accidentally hurt a toddler, who will be responsible? The robot itself, the owner of the robot, or the manufacturer? Moreover, if a corporation is found guilty of fabricating robots that “learn” to harm people, who will go to jail, since corporations are non-human legal entities with “No Soul to Damn, No Body to Kick”? Read the rest of this entry »

Comments
1 Comment »
Categories
DARPA SyNAPSE
Tags
law and robotics, robot, robotic weapons
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Jump to

About Neurdon
About SyNAPSE
Contact
Contributors
Editors
Glossary
Neurdon Merch

Tags

adaline adaptive resonance theory artificial intelligence cat brain consciousness continous firing neurons controller cortical column DARPA DARPA SyNAPSE Dharmendra Modha Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials global workspace theory Greg Snider HP HRL IBM Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials it Izhikevich law and robotics learning markram MATLAB MATLAB code Melanie-Mitchell memristor memristors Minsky modha modular robotics money Moore's Law Narayan Srinivasa neuromorphic technology object recognition poggio rat brain rate-based models Ray Kurzweil riesenhuber robot robotics robotic weapons sensory fusion serre software spike-based models spiking neurons Stanley Williams stdp supercomputer super computer synaptic plasticity time as supervisor

Blogroll

  • CELEST
  • CNS Tech Lab
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox