• Home
  • DARPA SyNAPSE
  • Business-minded
  • Compute Me
  • Brainplug
  • Biophys-Ed

The ever-changing BCI demographic

Sean Lorenz | February 20, 2010

Brain-computer interfacing is an area of research that is currently in flux as researchers try to understand not only what but who BCIs will work best for. One study by a group of researchers at Bremen University, Germany has recently attempted to determine who, exactly, is the key demographic for BCI use. More specifically, they looked at a group of subjects using a certain flavor of EEG-based BCI called steady state visually evoked potential (SSVEP), a technique where visual stimuli are flashed on a screen at certain frequencies. These flashes have very nice EEG signals for increasing classification accuracy during a certain visual task.

The results showed that an SSVEP BCI system was an effective form of communication for most of their 106 subjects. Who performed best? (drumroll please) Young people! Shocked? No, me neither. The authors note, however, that the result was not statistically significant since older subjects are known to have smaller evoked potentials for visual attention tasks. Another confounding issue stems from the fact that a majority of these types of studies are performed with young male populations from that particular study’s university.

Another problem is that many subjects find the use of SSVEP BCIs to be highly annoying. One could safely predict that having a white light flashing in your eyes for an hour is not enjoyable. This particular study was only 20 minutes in length, so most subjects had no problem with the visual stimuli presented. What made this particular study interesting was the use of a questionnaire given to each subject that addressed attentional strategies, mood, and personality factors. Understanding how users interact with BCI tasks is an important element in refining future BCI software and paradigms, since factors such as personality and mental strategy often correlate with higher (or lower) performance. There are numerous methods for improving BCI performance, many of which are user-dependent and cannot be generalized to the entire population of BCI users. However, knowing the key demographics for certain BCI applications, and continuing to garner feedback from users can assist researchers and software/hardware developers to find which factors can be either ignored or bolstered.

Categories
Brain Plug
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Robotics and memristors Second Memristor and Memristive Systems Symposium »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Jump to

About Neurdon
About SyNAPSE
Contact
Contributors
Editors
Glossary
Neurdon Merch

Tags

adaline adaptive resonance theory arm processor artificial intelligence auditory cat brain cochlear implant consciousness continous firing neurons controller cortical column DARPA DARPA SyNAPSE Dharmendra Modha events Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials FACETS flash memory global workspace theory Greg Snider hearing HP HRL IBM Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials iSLC it Izhikevich law and robotics learning Leon Chua markram MATLAB MATLAB code Melanie-Mitchell memristor memristors Minsky modha modular robotics money Moore's Law Narayan Srinivasa neural engineering neural prosthesis neuromorphic technology NSF object recognition poggio rat brain rate-based models Ray Kurzweil riesenhuber robot robotics robotic weapons sensory fusion serre software SPICE model spike-based models spiking neurons Stanley Williams stdp super computer supercomputer synaptic plasticity time as supervisor

Blogroll

  • CELEST
  • CNS Tech Lab
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox