<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Complexity by Melanie Mitchell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neurdon.com/2009/07/29/review-of-complexity-by-melanie-mitchell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neurdon.com/2009/07/29/review-of-complexity-by-melanie-mitchell/</link>
	<description>We put the sci in sci-fi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 02:18:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.neurdon.com/2009/07/29/review-of-complexity-by-melanie-mitchell/comment-page-1/#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurdon.com/?p=848#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>Who, in your opinion, does a better job of walking through the potential alternatives to reductionist science? I agree that we&#039;ll always need a reductionist strategy for understanding many aspects of the universe, but it seems we need a broader set of strategies to understand or anticipate more complex phenomena. As a newbie to the area, am curious. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who, in your opinion, does a better job of walking through the potential alternatives to reductionist science? I agree that we&#8217;ll always need a reductionist strategy for understanding many aspects of the universe, but it seems we need a broader set of strategies to understand or anticipate more complex phenomena. As a newbie to the area, am curious. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.neurdon.com/2009/07/29/review-of-complexity-by-melanie-mitchell/comment-page-1/#comment-3120</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neurdon.com/?p=848#comment-3120</guid>
		<description>You might be interested in this pdf paper about neuromorphic computing. http://bit.ly/rj5kt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested in this pdf paper about neuromorphic computing. <a href="http://bit.ly/rj5kt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/rj5kt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
